Link | Submitted By | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Game On Newgrounds | maeronta |
Epos-migrated-Last Updated: 07/06/2010 18:39 |
Additional Info
|
Quote from: "embrezar"
http://forum.kongregatehack.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2644&p=28086#p28086 |
Additional Info
|
Quote from: "Zirak"
I noticed that in my process list, and I hadn't seen it before so I thought it was some malware or something. When I ended the process, the Flash video I was watching broke and I figured out that it was actually something important. The idea is good in theory, but the fact that it increases Firefox's memory usage drastically sucks... my Firefox leaks memory like crazy, and the last thing I need is another process using 75+MB of memory when it's lagging just as hard as when there was no extra process. I only have 2GB of memory, and Firefox has many times used in excess of 1GB of memory by itself... sure, 75MB won't seem like much at that point, but hey, if Firefox is taking over half my system memory, I need every free byte I can get. Anyhow, thanks for your reply and for the link. |
Additional Info
|
What the hell did you do with your firefox process, that it needs 1GB of memory? The max. mine needs (I have a single-core processor and 2GB RAM) is 200MB (firefox.exe + plugin-container.exe).
The good idea behind this is, that most of the newer computers have 4GB RAM+. For freaks, there are PCs with 32GB RAM. What I want to say is, if you get a computer from 2010, you won't have any problems. This post was imported from an account that no longer exists! Previous Name: phreneticus |
Additional Info
|
Quote from: "phreneticus" What the hell did you do with your firefox process, that it needs 1GB of memory? The max. mine needs (I have a single-core processor and 2GB RAM) is 200MB (firefox.exe + plugin-container.exe). Sadly enough, not much. I open a picture or ten here, a flash game or movie there, and the next thing I know, for every five seconds the browser runs, it lags for 2.5 to 3 seconds which makes it practically unusable. I have a dual-core CPU, Athlon 64 X2 5600+... it was good when I got it, but I'm sure there are much better ones now. However, even a crappy computer should be able to run Firefox without it using over 1GB of memory. |
Additional Info
|
Quote from: "embrezar" Sadly enough, not much. I open a picture or ten here, a flash game or movie there, and the next thing I know, for every five seconds the browser runs, it lags for 2.5 to 3 seconds which makes it practically unusable. I have a dual-core CPU, Athlon 64 X2 5600+... it was good when I got it, but I'm sure there are much better ones now. However, even a crappy computer should be able to run Firefox without it using over 1GB of memory. That's Firefawks for ya. Mine uses ~500MB with a few windows running video and flash, just a ridiculously clumsy program. Try removing and unneeded plugins or addons embrezar, that should cut down on the clutter associated with the browser. |