Hack Votes Policy Revision
Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/12/2016 10:12pm
Quote Post
Ubi Maior Minor Cessat

The 15 seconds delay between votes has been lifted. Give it a try and speak your mind, feedback and fair use are highly encouraged.

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/12/2016 11:03pm
Quote Post
TIM the Enchanter
Level: 1
ADR Info

I literally changed "15" to "-1" so we can set it to whatever we want, whenever we want
 





Everything's coming up KongHack!

"When you know nothing matters, the universe is yours" ~Rick Sanchez

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/12/2016 11:07pm
Quote Post
Oh, hey...
The Ignorant Masses Posted on: 10/12/2016 11:03pm

I literally changed "15" to "-1" so we can set it to whatever we want, whenever we want
 



    Great, no use of my previous post. Now we just wait for some retard to do something stupid. We always get 1 of those every week or so :P

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/13/2016 6:23am
Quote Post
Ubi Maior Minor Cessat

Most hacks need to be applied before playing the game. Do you expect people to use one hack at a time to test if it works, refresh and go to vote? Khut already lacked this limitation, it is handy but we shouldn't grow too dependant on it. Not to mention that it is not available to non windows users. I hope this change will prove to be a quality of life change for hack users... and not just arguing ground for hack makers.
 

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/16/2016 9:16am
Quote Post
Will find games for points

Why was there a 15 second rule in the first place?
Was it to have people think before they vote or was it so people don't bot upvotes?




==Me== Dat boi who reached 1,000 points in a day by finding obscure games on kongregate, newgrounds and miniclip  ==Me==
==Everyone Else== Got points like normal people ==Everyone Else==

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/16/2016 9:56am
Quote Post
Ubi Maior Minor Cessat

sort of to prevent abuse but there are many other lines of defence that all it did was being a nuisance to voters. You can still try to abuse votes by mass random voting but you'll soon hit a wall and you'll probably get a harsh judgement. Nobody wins

 

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/16/2016 10:18am
Quote Post
Will find games for points

Thanks for the speedy reply Zenwaichi! It's good to see the site is alive and get a response being a mere n00b.




==Me== Dat boi who reached 1,000 points in a day by finding obscure games on kongregate, newgrounds and miniclip  ==Me==
==Everyone Else== Got points like normal people ==Everyone Else==

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/19/2016 11:44am
Quote Post

the limit removal is nice since the KHUT tool auto votes  without hitting the restrictions :) 

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/19/2016 6:27pm
Quote Post
TIM the Enchanter
Level: 1
ADR Info
Issues Posted on: 10/19/2016 11:44am

the limit removal is nice since the KHUT tool auto votes  without hitting the restrictions :) 


The KHUT never had limits, so what you just said makes no sense.





Everything's coming up KongHack!

"When you know nothing matters, the universe is yours" ~Rick Sanchez

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/19/2016 7:03pm
Quote Post
Oh, hey...
The Ignorant Masses Posted on: 10/19/2016 6:27pm

The KHUT never had limits, so what you just said makes no sense.


    lol. He's right though. There were limits on manually voting, but not for the trainer. It wouldn't make sense to do so.

RE: Hack Votes Policy Revision Posted on: 10/21/2016 11:14am
Quote Post
The Ignorant Masses Posted on: 10/19/2016 6:27pm
Issues Posted on: 10/19/2016 11:44am

the limit removal is nice since the KHUT tool auto votes  without hitting the restrictions :) 


The KHUT never had limits, so what you just said makes no sense.



being pretty new to KH didnt know KHUT never had limits, in which case i guess its catch 22? i have yet to look into  many of the non kong hacks where it would make sense to manually vote but i would think those there would be time  inbetween that i wouldnt matter too much on having a time limit unless they were all AOB changes.  sorry for not understanding all of the aspects just yet, still learning! indecision