Trainer Version: x.x.xx
Operating System: Windows 7 x64
Suggestion:
    Hey, I think it would be really cool if you could add readmem to this bitch, or at least something similar, like a pig capable climbing to tree top.  Yeah, a pig capable climbing to tree top please.

:)  seriously, readmem is a cheatengine auto-assembler script function. Its format on CE AA is like this:

_aLabel+12:
readmem(_anotherLabel+3, 2)

it is equivalent as :
_aLabel+12:
db xx yy

where xx yy is the aob of length 2 at address _anotherLabel+3

_anotherLabel may be same _aLabel.

It is similar to a memcopy function, with source, destination and length.

The readmem function allow to make a bit more complex cheat that like, replacing string, function etc.

As an example, Kingroad's Remote Service make heavy use of this function.

The same can be make without this readmem function, but it allow the aob to be more update resistant.

It may need to change the page ui of entering aob.

Thank you~

from what i understand, kadat doesnt use any part of cheat engine or its functions. he built everything himself.
in order for it to use cheatengine functions would require tons of effort and time,or possibly just integrating the trainer with cheat engine itself.

he might be able to build some form of autoassembly or Lua scripting into the trainer. though it might take a while. especially since im sure he'll work on the trainer actually installing and working for everyone before he adds more functions to it. right kadat? right? *cough*

personally, if he was able to integrate trainer functionality with autoassembly and lua, id submit many more trainers. just the fact that the autoassembly creates its own codecave would be tremendously helpful for many of the hackers here.

I bet Sir Kolonelkadat will say it is a peice of cake for readmem function in itself, comparing with x86 or lua script (these may be 2 or 3 peices of cake :D ).
But readmem do have some caveat, eg. overlapping of source and destination, ie.   memcopy(0x10 (source), 0x20 (dest), 50 (length)), this need special care , for example, that may have to copy by reversing the copy direction, or just disallow overlapping.

I do agree it may be in last of to-do-list.
 

Here's the thing.  If we allow users to load scripts via our Trainer, we're effectively runing our trainer into a potential virus factory.  One ass clown adds some code that deletes system32 or downloads a botnet and we're fucked.  Something like this is going to require a sign off system where at least 2 mods review the code and sign off on it as clean.

An Aob, while potentially dangerous, is just modifying the memory of the local application.  Should we see a 1000 character AoB, I'm sure someone will say something.  Sound we miss a malicious chunk of code, well, the person who runs it might not be able to respond for a while.

Any ideas?

this is true, but loading trainers or scripts directly is more of a risk than an aob. we know an aob's length and if there are aob's that are larger than normal, the mods know pretty quickly.
 

i dont think the memcpy would be much of a risk if kadat codes it properly, since its just being used for the readmem function.

the trusted member thing would be a good idea, but the amount of coding for readmem probably isnt worth it just for the 20 or so trusted member that may or may not use it.

 

lol. ok moses. go use your snake staff to part the sea and talk to burning bushes. just remember you cant wear sandals.

#HYPE

got a chance to work on this again

It's now live on the site for testing!